Home telemonitoring in smart rurality: results from the HIS2R interreg feasibility pilot study.

AIMS: The Health in Smart Rurality Interreg project aims to assess the feasibility of telemonitoring in rural areas across the Franco-Belgian border among patients affected by heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The objectives were to better understand strengths or barriers to implementing telemonitoring for early detection of potential adverse events, for improving quality of life, communication, and care coordination. METHODS: Using a prospective 6-month observational design, interconnected pads were provided to community-dwelling adults aged over 60 years. The device monitored daily body weight, temperature, cardiac rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation. Using predefined warning thresholds, data were analyzed by a nurse case-manager who also provided therapeutic education during their contacts. RESULTS: Out of 87 eligible and screened patients, 21 (24%) were included in the study. At the end of the follow-up, 19 patients (90%) were re-assessed. The rate of hospitalization and mortality was high (32% and 10%, respectively). A total of 644 alerts were recorded (median of 29 alerts/patients) with a high rate of technically-related alerts (TRA) (26%). Out of the 475 non-TRA, 79% and 1% have led to an intervention by the case-manager or the physician, respectively. Therapeutic adjustment was proposed for 12 patients during that period. CONCLUSION: Telemonitoring appears to be a promising solution for the follow-up of patients living far from medical resources. The contribution of a case-manager is of added-value in managing alerts, therapeutic education, and coaching. Many questions remain open such as the improvement of technical aspects and long-term compliance in a real-world setting.

A qualitative study of the perception of nursing home practitioners about the implementation of quality indicators for drug consumption in nursing homes.

INTRODUCTION: Nursing homes (NHs) are an ideal environment in which to implement interventions aimed at reducing inappropriate prescriptions. Quality indicators (QIs) may be useful to standardize practices, but it is unclear how they mediate change. In the framework of a quantitative study aimed at reducing the prescription of anticholinergic drugs among NH residents using QIs, we performed a qualitative study to describe the investigators' perception of the utility of QIs. METHODS: Qualitative study using focus group methodology. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed, and analyzed by thematic analysis. Participants were purposefully recruited from among the medical directors of the NHs in the quantitative study. RESULTS: Five medical directors participated in two focus group meetings. The main themes to emerge were: (1) communication is key to introducing new practices and achieving lasting uptake; (2) improved coordination and communication provided useful information to help interpret the quantitative results observed: e.g., participants reported that they were able to obtain contextual and patient-specific information that explained why some prescribers had consistently, but justifiably "poor" performance on the quantitative indicators; (3) negative aspects reported included reluctance to change among prescribers and the tendency to shirk responsibility. CONCLUSION: From the point of view of medical directors of NHs participating in an interventional program to reduce inappropriate prescriptions of anticholinergic drugs, the main factor driving the success of the program was communication, which is key to achieving adherence. Improved communication provides useful insights into the reasons why no quantitative reduction is observed in objective quality indicators.